106.7 The Fan All News 99.1 WNEW CBS Sports Radio 1580

Search Area For Missing Malaysian Airlines Jet Too Deep For Robotic Sub

View Comments
The Bluefin 21, Artemis autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV), is hoisted back on board the Australian Defense Vessel Ocean Shield after successful buoyancy testing on April 1, 2014. (credit: Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Peter D. Blair/U.S. Navy via Getty Images)

The Bluefin 21, Artemis autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV), is hoisted back on board the Australian Defense Vessel Ocean Shield after successful buoyancy testing on April 1, 2014. (credit: Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Peter D. Blair/U.S. Navy via Getty Images)

Latest News

Get Breaking News First

Receive News, Politics, and Entertainment Headlines Each Morning.
Sign Up

PERTH, Australia (CBS News/CBSDC/AP) — A robotic submarine hunting for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 aborted its first mission after only six hours, surfacing with no new clues when it exceeded its maximum depth along the floor of the Indian Ocean, officials said Tuesday.

Search crews sent the U.S. Navy’s Bluefin 21 into the depths Monday to begin scouring the seabed for the missing Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 after failing for six days to detect any new signals believed to be coming from its black boxes.

The Bluefin 21 was sent down to create a 3-D map of the ocean floor near where investigators believe that missing jetliner may have ended up, reports CBS News correspondent Seth Doane.

The submersible was supposed to be down there mapping the sea bed for 16 hours, but it only lasted 6 hours before it exceeded its “maximum depth limit” of 15,000 feet. Then, a built-in safety feature was triggered and that automatically returned the submersible to the surface.

Investigators analyzed the data it collected and said they found “nothing of interest”.

The Bluefin 21 was not damaged and the U.S. Navy plans to deploy it again. Crews were shifting the Bluefin’s search area away from the deepest water and were hoping to send it back on another mission later Tuesday.

Meanwhile, up to eleven planes and eleven ships have been scouring the surface looking for debris. Though authorities have said they believe that the chance of finding floating debris on the surface has “greatly diminished”.

Search authorities had known the primary search area for Flight 370 was near the limit of the Bluefin’s dive capabilities. Deeper-diving submersibles have been evaluated, but none is yet available to help.

A safety margin would have been included in the Bluefin’s program to protect the device from harm if it went a bit deeper than its 4,500-meter limit, said Stefan Williams, a professor of marine robotics at the University of Sydney.

“Maybe some areas where they are doing the survey are a little bit deeper than they are expecting,” he said. “They may not have very reliable prior data for the area.”

Meanwhile, officials were investigating an oil slick about 3.4 miles from the area where the last underwater sounds were detected.

Crews collected an oil sample and sent it back to Perth in western Australia for analysis, a process that will take several days, said Angus Houston, the head of the joint agency coordinating the search off Australia’s west coast.

He said it does not appear to be from any of the ships in the area, but cautioned against jumping to conclusions about its source.

The Bluefin can create a three-dimensional sonar map of any debris on the ocean floor. But the search is more challenging in this area because the seabed is covered in silt that could potentially cover part of the plane.

“What they’re going to have to be looking for is contrast between hard objects, like bits of a fuselage, and that silty bottom,” Williams said. “With the types of sonars they are using, if stuff is sitting up on top of the silt, say a wing was there, you could likely see that … but small items might sink down into the silt and be covered and then it’s going to be a lot more challenging.”

The search moved below the surface after crews picked up a series of underwater sounds over the past two weeks that were consistent with signals from an aircraft’s black boxes, which record flight data and cockpit conversations. The devices emit “pings” so they can be more easily found, but their batteries last only about a month and no sounds have been heard for seven days.

Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott raised hopes last week when he said authorities were “very confident” the underwater signals were from the black boxes on Flight 370, which disappeared March 8 during a flight from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, to Beijing with 239 people on board, mostly Chinese.

Houston said Monday that the signals were a promising lead, but that finding aircraft wreckage in the remote, deep patch of ocean remains extremely difficult.

There have been numerous false leads in the search for the missing plane.

The submarine is programmed to take 24 hours to complete each mission: two hours to dive to the bottom, 16 hours to search the seafloor, two hours to return to the surface, and four hours to upload the data.

The black boxes could contain the key to unraveling the mystery of what happened to Flight 370. Investigators believe the plane went down in the southern Indian Ocean based on a flight path calculated from its contacts with a satellite and an analysis of its speed and fuel capacity. But they still don’t know why.

On Tuesday, Malaysia’s defense minister, Hishamuddin Hussein, pledged to reveal the full contents of the black boxes if they are found.

“It’s about finding out the truth,” he told reporters in Kuala Lumpur. “There is no question of it not being released.”

Up to 11 planes and as many ships were scouring a 24,000-square mile patch of ocean about 1,400 miles northwest of Perth on Tuesday, hunting for any floating debris.

The weekslong surface search is expected to end in the next two days. Officials haven’t found a single piece of debris confirmed to be from the plane, and Houston said the chances that any would be found have “greatly diminished.”

U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said recently that terrorism could not be ruled out.

“I don’t think at this point we can rule anything in or out. I think we have to continue to search, as we are,” Hagel said. “And you know the United States continues to stay committed.”

(TM and © Copyright 2014 CBS Radio Inc. and its relevant subsidiaries. CBS RADIO and EYE Logo TM and Copyright 2014 CBS Broadcasting Inc. Used under license. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)

View Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,561 other followers