106.7 The Fan All News 99.1 WNEW CBS Sports Radio 1580

Obama Says US Will Respect ‘Afghan Sovereignty’

View Comments
President Barack Obama, in a letter sent Wednesday to Afghan President Hamid Karzai, said the U.S. will continue to respect "Afghan sovereignty" under a new security agreement.  (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

President Barack Obama, in a letter sent Wednesday to Afghan President Hamid Karzai, said the U.S. will continue to respect “Afghan sovereignty” under a new security agreement. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Latest News

Get Breaking News First

Receive News, Politics, and Entertainment Headlines Each Morning.
Sign Up

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama, in a letter sent Wednesday to Afghan President Hamid Karzai, said the U.S. will continue to respect “Afghan sovereignty” under a new security agreement.

Obama also said the U.S. military will not conduct raids on Afghan homes except under “extraordinary circumstances” involving urgent risks to U.S. nationals. The raids have been a particularly sensitive issue to the Afghans.

Obama’s letter comes a day after Karzai and Secretary of State John Kerry agreed to a new security framework that would govern the relationship between their countries after the U.S.-led combat mission formally concludes at the end of next year. It could clear the way for thousands of U.S. troops to train and assist Afghan forces after the mission ends.

The agreement announced Wednesday is far from complete. The document now goes to the Loya Jirga, a 2,500-member council of elders that has the right to revise or reject any clause of the draft agreement.

Karzai added a wrinkle to the process Thursday when he told the Loya Jirga that if they and parliament approve the agreement it should be signed after next spring’s elections in Afghanistan.

Karzai’s abrupt decision to defer signing the agreement until after the April 5 elections came even as he said he supported the Bilateral Security Agreement in a speech to the Loya Jirga.

Such a development could be a potential deal breaker as the United States has said it wants an agreement as soon as possible to allow planners in the United States and NATO to prepare for a military presence after 2014. The U.S. had wanted a deal signed by the end of October.

In his letter to Karzai, Obama wrote, “We look forward to completing this agreement promptly.”

On the U.S. side, only the Obama administration needs to approve the agreement, but it could reject changes made by Afghan officials. If it does, that leaves open the option for the U.S. to pull all troops out of Afghanistan.

The agreement would give the U.S. a legal basis for having forces in Afghanistan after 2014, and also allow it to use bases across the country.

Obama noted Karzai’s concerns about Afghans’ safety and privacy. “Over time, and especially in the recent past, we have redoubled our efforts to ensure that Afghan homes are respected by our forces and that our operations are conducted consistent with your law,” he wrote. “We will continue to make every effort to respect the sanctity and dignity of Afghans in their homes and in their daily lives, just as we do for our own citizens.”

The agreement set to remain in force until the end of 2024 and beyond, unless terminated by mutual agreement or by either party with two years’ written notice.

While the agreement allows for a decade-long, if not longer, presence for U.S. troops, they may not be there over that period. The Obama administration has yet to specify how long U.S. troops might actually remain in Afghanistan to complete their training and support mission, and the agreement extends far past Obama’s tenure as president.

U.S. officials have not yet disclosed the number of U.S. troops they want to keep in Afghanistan after 2014. U.S. officials have said the U.S. and NATO could keep between 8,000 and 12,000 troops there. Of those, the U.S. is expected to provide no more than 8,000.

Kerry said that Wednesday that whatever the number, the role of the U.S. military would be “limited.”

“It is entirely train, equip and assist. There is no combat role for United States forces, and the bilateral security agreement is a way to try to clarify for Afghans and for United States military forces exactly what the rules are with respect to that ongoing relationship,” he said.

(© Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

View Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,548 other followers